What do you rely on?
The useful things AI does will keep happening. You'll still be able to prompt up a single-serving, personal piece of software to perform one task with moderate reliability for your use, and when it stops working, you'll be able to do it again. You'll still be able to transcribe audio, or summarize a document. You'll still be able to use a chatbot as an interactive journal, or as a supercharged spellchecker.
None of that will change – and neither will the limits on all those activities. If you don't know enough about a document or its subject to spot obvious errors in an AI summary, you'll be periodically misled. If you're so desperate or uninformed that you trust summaries you lack the capacity to evaluate in critical situations, you may be led to disaster. If you don't know anything about computers and you turn a piece of vibe-coded software loose on your machine, you might delete something important, or irreversibly expose sensitive data to the public internet.
This is Cory Doctorow in a recent Locus piece. I am always looking for uses in the back of my head. And aside from whisper I have not found any yet.
Paradoxically, it's sort of the best time in history to be using notebooks. As models / agents have gotten better at reading handwriting, extracting your chicken scratch is easier than ever. So that pain of struggling to reread your own handwriting is effectively … gone. Magic. We're living through a weird moment in time. Might as well have a great notebook by your side.
Says Craig Mod while selling you a notebook for 40€. Sure, it is beautiful. But damn. I need to get better at binding my own notebooks. I have been doing it for ages, but looking at this I can certainly up my game!
We have fallen into habits that are steadily deskilling the human body, eroding capacities honed by evolution to support our wellbeing as we move through the world. Some of these capacities are weakening through disuse: we have come to rely on our phones, for example, and now, increasingly, on AI, to rapidly do work that would once have required something more physical – like looking around, or asking someone, or going to find and consult a book. Reliance on GPS may weaken both our spatial attention and the fluency of our wayfinding. In surrendering to a quick technological fix, we are, moment by moment, doing less sensing, navigating, remembering, walking, choosing, and attending. Other capacities are being retrained by machines and algorithms to work against us: for instance, smartphones and chatbots can train us to keep reaching for them even when we no longer enjoy using them, turning a conscious choice into an automatic habit and a colossal waste of time. The body that results is less able to assess its own condition, improvise and regulate itself. The crucial distinction is between technologies that strengthen our capacities and those that repeatedly substitute for the actions through which those capacities are formed.
I listened to this and it was really good! Creepy and good. And I certainly can relate to much of it and it is one of the reasons, why I am averse to using the whole LLM thing. Until a use case comes around that works for me. We'll see. I like my little tools.